The Great Depression also spawned the modern survivalist movement amongst groups of people who, having already lost so much, were prepared to defend to the death what little they had left. Assuming that total anarchy would break out any moment in response to the crumbling economy, survivalists started stockpiling weapons and suggested others do the same.
They also started practicing paramilitary drills and developing tactical weapons training in preparation for what they believed to be impending societal collapse, a hobby that caught the attention of the U.
Most of the time, the characterization of survivalists as terrorist is way off, and more than a little ironic — stockpiling guns is legal yet also a sign of domestic terrorism — but there are some tragic instances in which stockpiled weapons have been used for that exact purpose.
As Vox reports , many preppers started stockpiling extra hard after the election of President Barack Obama out of a not-so-subtly racist fear over what would happen to the country at the hands of its first black president. Similarly, many studies and scholars have found that white folks have increased their stockpiling activities during periods in history when they feel that immigrants, people of color or other historically marginalized groups threaten the existing social order. At certain points in history, though, people have also stockpiled weapons in the name of civil rights.
Maddeningly, says Helms, it took a bunch of armed black people to speed up the passage of something called the Mulford Act, which banned the carrying of loaded weapons in public in California. Well, not Adam Lanza, apparently. Meanwhile, in less institutionally racist history, Y2K and the stockpiling craze that surrounded it also provided a salient example of how firearm hoarding habits reflected popular social currents in the build up to the year Helms finds people like Steve endlessly amusing.
As HuffPo points out , nothing inspires stockpiling more than a good conspiracy theory. But perhaps no one loves stockpiling weapons more than cults, whose rich history with stockpiling weapons flies in the face of the stereotype of gun owners as fat, white dudes in the South. Throughout the early- to mids, the infamous Rajneeshee cult featured in Wild, Wild Country built up an impressive stockpile of weapons that they used to conduct tactical paramilitary training for their members in preparation for a possible showdown with the townspeople of Antelope, Oregon, and the FBI.
In these instances, the risk of injury is great both to those near the site of the fire and to firefighters seeking to stop the flames from spreading. The dangers of ammunition stockpiles exploding during fires is real, with numerous instances of these explosions occurring each year.
Reporting indicates that the fire originated in a room where reloading ammunition powder was stored and that ammunition rounds were exploding while firefighters were attempting to extinguish the flames; reporting also indicates that the bullet fire prevented bystanders from helping the victims get out of the house. Federal law also does not impose age restrictions on the possession of long gun ammunition. While individuals under the age of 18 are not permitted to possess handgun ammunition, there is no similar age limitation on the possession of long gun ammunition, including ammunition for semi-automatic assault rifles.
Additionally, while licensed gun dealers may not sell long gun ammunition to individuals under age 18, there is no similar restriction on private sellers, meaning that individuals who are not licensed dealers are free to sell any quantity of long gun ammunition to any individual of any age. Since , sales of both firearms and ammunition have been subject to an excise tax 35 collected by the manufacturer or importer based on the domestic wholesale price.
Compounding concerns about public safety, ammunition is excluded from the items under the oversight and regulation of the U. Consumer Product Safety Commission as a result of legislation enacted in Online forums provide information about different voluntary recalls of ammunition and best practices for buying ammunition at gun shows.
Another large part of the ammunition industry that currently evades any formal regulation or oversight is the practice of making ammunition at home. Some gun owners choose to make their own ammunition as a hobby, rather than purchase ready-made ammunition from stores, as a means to create an ideal form of ammunition for their guns or in an effort to save money.
While some people create ammunition solely for their own personal use, others sell reloaded ammunition in private transactions or at gun shows. Moreover, there are no systems in place for inspection of homemade ammunition to ensure it is properly reloaded and will not cause injury to the user.
When it comes to the sale and possession of ammunition, a few states have acted to fill some of the regulatory gaps in federal law. According to an analysis of state laws by the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, California and New York are the only two states that require background checks for ammunition sales. The purpose of any type of bullet is to penetrate the intended target and cause some degree of damage or injury.
However, just as there are multiple types and calibers of firearms, there is also a wide variety of types of ammunition that vary in their wounding and lethality potential.
The industry continues to advance ammunition design to include new features or increase the so-called stopping power of the bullet. As the ammunition industry has continued to evolve and innovate, policymakers largely have failed to keep pace and update laws and regulations to ensure that appropriate restrictions are put in place for ammunition that poses increased risks to community safety.
Congress has determined that there is one type of ammunition that poses a heightened risk to public safety and warrants additional regulation: armor-piercing ammunition. The dangers of bullets capable of penetrating soft body armor—commonly referred to as bulletproof vests—were repeatedly raised by law enforcement organizations in the late s and early s. LEOPA dramatically restricted the manufacture, importation, and sale of this type of ammunition, largely banning it with few exceptions.
The authority to determine whether a particular type of ammunition meets the statutory definition of armor piercing has been delegated to ATF. For the first two decades that LEOPA was in effect, ATF received relatively few requests from the gun industry to consider whether a specific type of ammunition was exempt from the armor-piercing ammunition ban under the sporting purposes exemption. Under this proposed framework, rifle ammunition would presumptively qualify for the exemption if the only type of handgun that it could be fired from were a single-shot handgun.
Any rifle ammunition that could be fired from a revolver or semi-automatic handgun would not receive the benefit of this presumption and would be banned. The proposal was met with fury from the gun lobby, which claimed that it was an effort by the Obama administration to undermine gun rights without congressional support.
The largest rounds of ammunition legally available to civilians in the United States are. The destructive potential of these firearms cannot be overstated.
In , the New York City police commissioner conducted a test to compare the power of a. Colonel Norman A. Chandler, a retired Marine and sniper rifle expert, explained the destructive power of a. While some gun enthusiasts minimize the risk of.
From through , 3, We have established a nexus to terrorist groups, outlaw motorcycle gangs, international drug cartels, domestic drug dealers, religious cults, militia groups, potential assassins, and violent criminals. The lack of regulations around both.
You could kill a man from over a mile away. You can dismantle a vehicle from a mile away. No questions asked. Federal law imposes no additional restrictions on the sale or possession of this type of ammunition. In fact, because. All semi-automatic firearms and some pump-action and bolt-action firearms load ammunition from a magazine, which can either be permanently fixed to the firearm or detachable. Magazines vary widely in terms of how many cartridges they can hold, with many retailers offering , , , and round magazines and drums.
While previous generations of high-capacity magazines tended to jam or malfunction, recent innovation in the design and materials used to make these magazines has resulted in a new generation of magazines that can hold upward of 40 rounds and maintain high functionality.
High-capacity magazines, when paired with semi-automatic assault rifles, can dramatically increase the lethality of a shooting. On August 4, , in Dayton, Ohio, a shooter armed with an AR-style firearm and a round drum magazine fired 41 bullets in roughly 30 seconds, striking 26 people and killing nine.
While the risks of high-capacity magazines are primarily discussed in the context of high-profile mass shootings, these magazines are also increasingly recovered by law enforcement in connection with episodes of gun violence in urban communities.
A study determined that weapons equipped with high-capacity magazines comprised 22 percent to 36 percent of guns used in crimes in the United States. From January 1, , to April 29, , the Baltimore Police Department recovered guns that had a magazine capacity of more than 10 rounds.
These firearm accessories also pose risks beyond U. Magazines with a capacity of more than 10 rounds were banned under U. Currently, only nine states and Washington, D. As with any loosely regulated consumer product industry, the gun and ammunition industry continues to innovate and develop new products to increase profits, including new types of ammunition.
One of the early examples of dangerous innovation in ammunition was the creation of the hollow point or expanding bullet. First developed in the 19th century, hollow point bullets are designed to expand upon impact, as opposed to full metal jacket ammunition, which typically remains intact after striking a target. Hollow point ammunition was first developed as military ammunition, although in at the Hague Convention, the leading powers included a ban on expanding bullets in international warfare in their newly established the norms around war; the United States declined to sign on to this provision.
Law enforcement officers in many jurisdictions began adopting hollow point rounds in the s because of the reduced risk of overpenetration—when a bullet passes through the intended target and strikes another person or object—which was common with other types of ammunition. Hollow point ammunition has been tied to some of the deadliest massacres in the United States. In his manifesto, the perpetrator of the August 3, , mass shooting in El Paso, Texas, who killed 22 people and injured dozens more, wrote specifically about his hopes to secure 8M3 rounds of ammunition to increase the lethality of his attack.
Hollow point ammunition is not currently subject to any type of increased regulation under federal law. However, in the early s, there was an intense national debate about whether this type of ammunition was appropriate for civilian use, with particular attention raised around the newly introduced Winchester Black Talon bullet.
The Black Talon was designed to expand and expose several sharp metal points in a star-like pattern, making the bullets remarkably challenging to remove without causing further harm to both the victim and the surgeon.
In addition, there is the matter of which arms should be covered by the treaty. Some States want to fall back on a convenient formula provided by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, but this is not comprehensive. Under the banner of the Control Arms campaign, thousands of civil society groups around the world are campaigning for an ATT based squarely in the protection of human rights and human security.
We are pushing for a treaty that will link each arms transfer decision with States' existing obligations under international law. This means a transfer should be blocked if there is a substantial risk that those arms will be used in serious violations of international human rights or humanitarian law.
In principal this proposal should not be controversial, since all member States have already agreed to uphold the provisions of the UN Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Geneva Conventions. However, most States have previously not considered these obligations to be related to decisions about arms transfers. Some countries have opposed the inclusion of the phrase "human rights" in the treaty, fearing that the phrase will be arbitrarily applied to block their acquisition of weapons for legitimate military or police use.
No need to fear, as the UN Charter protects such legitimate acquisitions. Meanwhile some Western countries have argued against this phrase as "it makes it difficult to get agreement".
Of course, it would be easier to get agreement on a weak treaty than on a strong one, because a weak treaty would not require much change in countries' existing policies. And a weak treaty would still have some symbolic value. Sorry, no. Mass killings, intimidation and torture are real, not symbolic. Only a strong, comprehensive treaty based explicitly on international legal obligations will be sufficient to prevent such abuses, and to reduce the supply of new weapons to the abusers.
Reducing the domestic supply of new weapons. While most countries permit civilian ownership of small arms, they are at the same time seeking to contain it to moderate levels.
What is considered a moderate or acceptable level of gun ownership in society is coming increasingly under scrutiny as governments recognize the need to strengthen their gun laws. Driven by regional and international agreements, popular pressure and expert advice, gun laws around the world are growing tighter and more uniform. The emerging norms include integrated renewable licensing and registration of firearms and owners, based on proof of a legitimate reason for possession, limits on the types and number of weapons a civilian can possess, minimum age limits, checks of criminal record and other personal information, safe storage requirements etc.
As the new laws reduce the proportion of the population legally entitled to buy or possess arms, as well as the number each licensee can own, the flow of new weapons into the country will slow. The stock of illegal small arms is actually a stock of formerly legal arms.
This is because almost all the small arms in the world were produced legally, manufactured in factories authorized and often owned by a national government. It is only when the product leaves the factory and enters the chain of commerce that the possibility of becoming illegal arises. The same gun can be legal or illegal at different points in that chain of commerce, depending on who has it in their possession.
As an example, a factory sells small arms legally to government agencies or to gun dealers. Due to insecure storage by the purchasers, some of those legal guns are then stolen, thus becoming illegal. Another common way for government weapons to become illegal is when the users e.
The journey from legal to illegal may pass through 'grey' patches where the legal status of a weapon is ambiguous. Retiring or demobilizing soldiers frequently keep the guns they previously used for work, a custom which is legal in some countries. However, an ex-soldier, unable to find another job, sometimes uses the gun to rob a store illegal ; or sells it to a friend illegal.
In a non-conflict country like the USA, a private citizen with no criminal record might buy a gun from the ex-soldier legal or a gunshop legal , and later sell it at a garage sale to a stranger legal or illegal, depending on local state or city law. The stranger may transfer it to a criminal gang illegal ; or he may simply keep the gun at home possibly legal , from where it may be stolen by a burglar illegal , or taken to school by his adolescent son to impress his friends illegal. The lethal potential of a firearm remains the same, regardless of its legal status.
Since the illegal arms market is supplied intentionally or otherwise by the legal arms industry, the key to reducing the former is to exert stronger control over the latter, to prevent legal weapons from crossing over into the illegal domain.
That control regime should include measures to track weapons and identify the point of diversion, systems to ensure physical security, and built-in mechanisms for monitoring and verification. Weak points in a regulatory framework become loopholes inviting exploitation by traffickers and by ordinary people seeking to avoid bureaucratic procedures.
Identifying points of diversion: the ITI. Many people would be astonished to learn that such a requirement does not already apply to small arms, unlike motor vehicles which have long been required to bear unique identifying VIN marks. The ITI requires the marking of existing small arms already in State stockpiles, and of new guns at the point of manufacture or import. States must keep accurate and comprehensive records of small arms in their jurisdictions. The implementation of these measures will advance disarmament by allowing police to retrace the history of a gun recovered on the scene of a crime or conflict, and thus identify the dealer, factory or armoury from which the weapon was diverted.
This improves the chances of finding and prosecuting the trafficker, and of closing any legal or procedural loopholes which may have enabled the diversion. One man compared gun collecting to buying several pairs of shoes.
Data on gun ownership in the United States remains fraught, largely because of the political and cultural intensity around the topic. Tracking gun deaths is arguably even more complicated. As Beckett points out for Guardian US , much of the existing data on gun ownership is debated. Gun rights advocates often argue that Americans underreport gun ownership—challenging reports that ownership is dropping—and, already, some of them are questioning the validity of the new survey.
0コメント