If you have a smaller monitor or browser window, you can reduce the size of your display to fit more content on the screen. You can also use full-screen mode on a mobile device. For example, you can use full-screen mode on a mobile phone to view the home screen of your favorite applications, play games, or watch videos. When you turn on full-screen mode, you will get wider images, but you will usually lose the ability to see text or scroll through pages.
In addition, some applications let you use a combination of full-screen and windowed modes. For example, Microsoft Word lets you view documents in full-screen mode and then switch to a smaller window to edit the document. While widescreen and full screen generally let you view a bigger-looking screen image on your device, they both have advantages and disadvantages. As mentioned above, widescreen is a display that has a ratio of It looks like a screen but is actually wider.
The standard widescreen screen uses the same aspect ratio as an HDTV, which is considered the ideal for viewing films and videos. The reason for this is that it allows you to fit a lot of images on the screen at once, while also giving you a good amount of height to see more content.
The full screen is simply a screen that looks like an old-fashioned screen, but has been stretched out to look like the standard. The size of the image is the same as a screen, but it looks like a screen. There are two types of widescreen display: the portable and the desktop.
Widescreen displays are generally used for watching movies and TV shows, but they can also be used for gaming if you use an external screen. If you want to play games on your phone or tablet, then this is the type of widescreen display you should use. Full screen mode is a feature that allows you to stretch the screen in an image.
It is also used in web browsing. The size of the image can also affect your choice between widescreen and full screen. Widescreen displays generally have a higher resolution than standard screens. As you know, the reason for this is that they have a wider screen and need to fit more content on the screen at once.
Some images are much bigger than others. If you want to view the image at a higher resolution, then you should use widescreen. It was clear that bigger movies did better. However, the vast majority of theaters could not accommodate three projectors in their theaters.
To get around this, cinematographers began shooting with special lenses that could squish wide shots onto square film. Later, if you were to play back using a projector with the appropriate lens, it would unsquish film to give it a wider aspect ratio.
This format was at first called CinemaScope, later evolving into widescreen. Widescreen soon became something to be experienced rather than simply entertainment. By the late 50s, almost all movies were shot in widescreen and films were beginning to be marketed as special events, rather than entertainment. People went to see particular films, and TV, with its square format, took over the casual entertainment side of motion pictures.
Now, widescreen TVs are commonplace and TV shows are more cinematic than ever. On the other hand, as the Quartz video points out, social media videos, like Facebook videos, look better in the square or vertical format. However, when we want to watch a film on our phone, we still turn it sideways. We watch it wide. Our eyes our set to see a panoramic view. It strips out a huge amount of the action. I am personally always amazed that people hold their phones vertically to shoot video.
I can understand holding a beer vertically but then you still have to tilt it if you want to fully enjoy its contents. Widescreen is what our natural field of vision sees. Hold your hands to the left and right side of your eyes and compare that to your field of vision when you hold your hands above and below your eyes.
Not many films are shot this way, though. It's very common to use a larger format to shoot with, especially for effects shots, but it's rare that the cinematographers intend for you to see the whole thing in those cases.
The other problem is that you don't really have any way of knowing when a film was shot in a larger format with intention of going to video. Because otherwise people get confused about where the sand people are. It's more than an aesthetic choice. What am I missing? Now when I encode to MP3 I do somewhere between to kb at 44 khz. For me this comes close enough to CD qualty that can't hear any diffence.
Now by any chance are you still listening to LP's? People have agure that they sound much better then CD's Bill Meadows Now you're just being stupid. There are audible differences between Mbps mp3s and CD quality audio.
If you can't hear it that's fine and you can be happy with your mp3. My video store only orders Full Screen versions of some movies. I wish they did not exist. The exist moreso because people are uneducated than they do because of preference. Stop referring to them as "widescreen" and " full screen" and start calling them "full image" and "narrowscreen".
If they sell everyone the narrowscreen version, then when everyone buys a widescreen TV they'll have to go back and buy all their movies again , because people are f'n idiots. I've been considering making a test DVD that demos the various aspect ratios, with comparisons between the narrowscreen image and the original source.
I figure I might be able to whip something up with avisynth, but it'll require me to actually HAVE some narrowscreen movies. I figure what you could do is fade the wider image slightly so that the 'full' frame image is highlighted, so that people could WATCH the difference. I'll have to play around after xmas I've got an uncle who's a freak about this shit, his attitude is that he doesn't want to waste television space, since he paid for a huge screen.
Holy Crap, Savetele still has a site up? I emailed him years back citing explicit examples of what the advantages of widescreen was. I know he was a troller but I had to try.
His response? Sigh, I simply wish his site would die, as it is a troll, and those that don't know better will still believe it. Now what's with this name calling?
With to kb you have good SQ with reasonable file sizes which is why most MP3 off P2P programs are in this range. Now most people get real anoryed by widescreen movies on regular TVs.
And personally I think widescreen DVDs are just a way to get people to buy expensive widescreen TVs that they would otherwise buy. Not name calling: You're being stupid. His site claims that they are superimposing the black bars over the movie and "censoring" it as such.
Why do people feel the need to outright LIE? He's either a retarded chimp or I don't know. Either way, people like him should be dragged into the street and shot. This applies to anyone who makes a website spreading lies without some sort of evidence that it is a joke. Is the DVD version the modified or is it the original widescreen version?
The back of the Season 1 box says: 'Widescreen Version presented in a "matted" widescreen format preserving a theatrical exhibition aspect ratio. Enhanced for widescreen tvs. Only if it was composed for showing that way. Anyone who needs to be convinced that widescreen is better need only rent the fullscreen pan 'n scan version of Lawrence of Arabia to see how the fullscreen treatment completely fucks up the well scene with Sharif and O'Toole.
I was just trying to provide a little extra context, which I feel is pertinent as there are some people who think that widescreen is be all and end all of presentation and deride material irrespective of that being its original aspect ratio AOR. For me it's all about seeing it as it was intended to be seen. As a general response it always amuses me when people talk about "black bars". These seem to be the bane of those who misunderstand the benefits of seeing something in its AOR and just want to see their content fill the whole of their screen.
THis mentality affects owners of widescreen TVs too. I've seen people complain that they still see these supposedly evil black bars when viewing 1. This is missing the point somewhat. Movies and other DVD content are made in a variety of different aspect ratios and until someone invents a TV that can amazingly morph shape to suit, you'll always see black bars when the ratio doesn't match that of your screen. Me, I have a set because at the time it made financial sense to to go that route.
0コメント