What does judicial review mean

The Court has also stated that it will not judge the wisdom of particular legislative and executive actions and will avoid political questions, but these principles have been interpreted differently by different justices. Create a List. List Name Save. Rename this List. Rename this list. List Name Delete from selected List. Save to. Save to:. To Harrison and his wife there was no distinction between the executive and judicial branches of the law.

And now I am going on to a review of the broad facts of the educational organization of our present world. This judicial bent of the child is a curious one and often develops a priggish fondness for setting others morally straight. In the New Testament a few examples appear in which his utterances are given a quasi-judicial tone. With this object in view, he has been continually paid his salary from the judicial expenses.

The principle by which courts can declare acts of either the executive branch or the legislative branch unconstitutional. These example sentences are selected automatically from various online news sources to reflect current usage of the word 'judicial review.

Send us feedback. See more words from the same year. Accessed 11 Nov. More Definitions for judicial review. Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!

Log in Sign Up. Save Word. Meanwhile, other courts resolve issues that pertain strictly to statutory interpretation, without any involvement of the constitutional court. The constitutional courts of other democracies may provide advisory or binding opinions about the constitutionality of an act separate from the adversarial process in which a real case involving the act at issue is brought to the court by a prosecutor or someone filing suit against another party.

However, the essence of judicial review, as invented and practiced in the United States, is similar to constitutional review used in other democratic countries. Several constitutional democracies, such as the Netherlands and Great Britain, do not practice judicial review. The rule of law is maintained in these countries through the democratic political process, especially elections, whereby the government is held accountable to the people.

However, judicial review or constitutional review seems to be an especially strong means to protect the rights of minorities against the threat of oppression by a tyrannical majority of the people acting through its representatives in the government.